rectangle

He means every rectangle on the grid -- for example, a 7 x 8 rectangle in the middle somewhere.

Does that mean that: > Square is a subset of rectangle so >rectangle always results in four right angles given that my only examples of rectangles are squares?

It's just that the rectangle doesn't necessarily have to be the entire screen like it always has.

The problem posed here is about colouring a 17x17 grid such that there is no monochromatic rectangle.

PS continues to get feature after feature but its basic rectangle select tool is still a complete pain to use.

As soon as you bend a curved surface attached to a small flat rectangle (IC), it pulls at the joins.

To compose a rectangle, mostly the net would create four lines - but having the lines terminate was obviously difficult.

Which implied that the input images were just compositions of simple geometric shapes - a circle within a rectangle, two circles intersecting, etc.

Dim out the page, zoom it down to a tiny rectangle, swoop it off screen and replace it with a busy icon, or something.

I wish that alternative was confined to a plugin running in a rectangle on the page.

Draw a circle/oval/rectangle/cloud/whatever around your names and suddenly there is zero ambiguity.

When I work in Python, I find I need to use emacs' support for rectangle editing frequently when rearranging nested blocks.

Note that pressing "Check" leads to the numbers being displayed in the rectangle in exactly the same way as they were displayed in the text box, which may depend on the position of the cursor in the text box.

You don't need quite that many -- you could test 2^289 (and you can probably skip many of them) and look for the "rectangle free subsets" that he mentions in the slides, and then just look for four of them that don't overlap.