bounding

Because: How do you create a bounding box around a convex set in R^d, with polynomially-many probes, so that the error is bounded?

Again: by all means argue that bounding the relative error in the return value of a log function is the Wrong Thing for almost all purposes.

Because he's not some CEO bounding on to the stage and projecting him self with his chest puffed out?

The usual distance bounding protocols only need a nano-second accurate timer on one device called the verifier.

Some sorts of random walks inside this bounding box will converge to this scaled Lebesgue measure.

A few other OneNote-specific tips: - Win+Shift+S freezes the display and lets you draw a bounding box to take a screenshot.

You'll have to figure out what distance you want to exclude from the bounding boxes.

Once you have this, do best fit bounding boxes around the data.

Notifications should be limited to the messages visible within your bounding box.

Even bounding to only chords of up to 3 or 4 notes still makes a pretty large output space, which means more training data is needed, it is harder to optimize, etc.

You start really simple, and say did I hit the bounding box that contains the object?

Pressing 1 enables debug mode, which shows some bounding boxes.

A common answer is "relating" or "bounding" -- appeal to something a target audience wants to be (or thinks it is).

And in particular: You talk about "creating a bounding box" for the reference Lebesgue measure -- saying that this first step is easy is basically assuming the whole problem is solved.

Bounding dependence is *the* core of rational risk management.