radiologists

Just like military radar operators got lots of automated assistance, radiologists will soon be backed up by automated systems.

Unlike with radiologists, being a software developer isn't really a career, so looking at BLS numbers doesn't make much sense.

Most radiologists won't take the time to create Multi-Planar Reformats along oblique or double-oblique angles.

And there's no rating on radiologists to tell you who has the most accurate diagnosis.

Responding to you a bit late… I certainly didn't intend to compare radiologists and dermatologists to median software developers.

Mimics by Materialise, Slicer) is mainly built for biomedical engineers, rather than radiologists.

For example, there is the Mimics commercial package that is on version 17, and similar things are actually quite commonly used by radiologists.

Turns out IBM Watson and other AI techniques are preparing to solve the fatigue problem of human radiologists reading thousands of images a day.

Many hospitals already do this with radiologists or neurologists for example.

The software used by most radiologists is more than two decades behind the state of the art, lacking even basic image registration and segmentation capabilities.

There is also a shortage of radiologists by design.

My ability to communicate has always led to my role as the technical point of contact for researchers, clinicians (surgeons, radiologists, etc.), and senior executives.

The issue is either False positive followed by heavyweight, risky and invasive checks or the non-committal of many radiology reports "further evaluation recommended..." Basically, radiologists are more afraid of being sued for missing something then they are of being sued for being too cautious.

Radiologists strive to mitigate the inherent problem of incidentalomas by using evidence based guidelines and attempting to rigidly adhere to them...