proof-of-concept

So they proceeded to turn the proof-of-concept into a production-grade renderer in time to render all the frames and save the movie.

You think a working proof-of-concept is the best way to make a point.

I can offer native Objective-C development and node.js on the backend and prototype most apps in 1-2 days (for proof-of-concept projects).

Just noticed it also has the proof-of-concept city scene I mentioned on the last page.

A handful of folks on the rendering team built a proof-of-concept renderer with support for the global-illumination look they wanted while also being able to handle the massive scale.

The site began as a proof-of-concept for Arc but has understandably become something a bit bigger, and as a result people are sometimes shocked and bemused at how anti-modern it appears.

> The site began as a proof-of-concept for Arc but has understandably become something a bit bigger, and as a result people are sometimes shocked and bemused at how anti-modern it appears.

We think we are faster as well (our first proof-of-concept study took about 9 months, which is faster but definitely not 1000X as fast), but I think the most important thing is to find something that actually works to treat patients.

Anyway, someone way at the top (the director or art director I think) saw the proof-of-concept renderings and decided that it was the perfect tool to attain their vision of this movie, which, by the way, has a hard release date something like three months away.

Proof-of-concept 15 second renders are doable, feature-length films with non-humans are doable (albeit with a LOT of human intervention), but 90 minutes of CGI humans is a lot harder.