poetical

The first third is just him waxing poetical about how much of a dumb shit he is and how that means he isn't qualified to comment.

Some of the moves he makes I cannot describe as anything but poetical.

It's a poetical polemic about his love of rollercoasters which is why it's all about rollercoasters.

I like this kind of geeky poetical comment while I'm not certain whether it is true or not.

Or, you could put it in more Nietzschean terms, things involving rebirth and phoenixes and Christ-figures, it could all get fairly poetical.

Falling in love is more poetical than dropping into poetry.

She could be more poetical when she chose to be.

But I think the pretty, poetical title is usually written by the author.

But in a poetical sense yeah, necessity begets use which begets development, and it's fascinating and inspiring that you were able to build your life around that.

Nobody I know who has one fails to wax poetical about them.

I suggest you to read Zen and Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, it is about exactly the same segregation, but in a much more poetical wording.

Waxed poetical about it, the way we remember our first kiss.

I think what bothers you is the poetical aspect of this text (in the sense of Jakobson's function of language, which boils down to, quoting wikipedia, focusing on "the message for its own sake").

This seems to fit what is said elsewhere in the article: >He protested that religion really has “nothing to do with belief” but “everything to do with Words—the Logos or Spirit that transform the life of those you address.” This feeling may be aggravated by the use of phrases such as "network of agents" which lie somewhere between scientific jargon and poetical language.

OED lists as: > Belonging to an earlier period, no longer in common use, > though still retained either by individuals, or > generally, for special purposes, poetical, liturgical If "no longer in common use" or "for special purposes" doesn't mean incorrect in an entirely consensus-driven language, what does?