peer-reviewed

Plenty of peer-reviewed papers suggest that this is either not true or the issue is not adequately resolved.

The reddit link does indeed have a bunch of peer-reviewed studies, but they are of highly variable quality.

It's perfectly fine to disagree, but to request a peer-reviewed journal about the efficacy of A/B testing?

The only scientific peer-reviewed studies ought to be more accurate and estimate much higher numbers of deaths.

There are literally tens of thousands of examples of precisely this happening available for your perusal, in the peer-reviewed literature!

Has any independent laboratory confirmed this effect and published on it in a peer-reviewed journal?

You need a peer-reviewed study before making it a procedure covered by insurance, etc.

Shawyer has often been dismissed because of his own lack of peer-reviewed scientific publications.

This comparison is hyperbole, I know, but his data and methodologies are peer-reviewed and support his claims.

Because, at the risk of pointing out the obvious, emails aren't peer-reviewed literature.

Also, the nice thing about the peer-reviewed literature is that it is published.

It would be nice to see some studies in credible peer-reviewed journals about the efficacy of direct marketing at getting consumers to buy their products.

I reject the "how many peer-reviewed, university-associated journal articles have they published" as any measure of success.

"Too urgent to be peer-reviewed" Maybe the sixteen co-authors could have...oh, wait what?