Pair used in a sentence

Pair in a sentence as a noun

But maybe it's paired off with say R2.

Look at some B1 marble, what's it paired with?

You keep rearranging pairs, trying to create new B1-R1 pairs but not destroy old ones.

You can't match them in pairs, reds are always going to remain in surplus.

You just try to change the pairings a bit to make it easy to convince me.

Mean scores for boy-boy pairs were highest \nfor the GUI condition.

But actually, there's no "spare R1", they're all in pairs already.

Well, $39 for a high quality pair of boots is a really, really good deal.

Next, imagine the cord is in fact the shaft of another pair of wheels.

I just went to the site -- you can do this -- picked a random pair of boots and put them in my shopping cart.

Does JustFab?I just went to the site -- you can do this -- picked a random pair of boots and put them in my shopping cart.

If that R1 you found was paired with B2 or B3, then by exchanging you just made things better by making a new B1-R1 connection.

The man must certainly own a pair of regular prescription glasses and was being extremely naive.

The article said its a mutation, but maybe those with the mutation exhibit a certain codon pair.

From that image it looks like you are making a standard purchase for a pair of shoes, and possibly just signing up to their site.

The generation new york times once characterised as "Would rather own one pair of $100 jeans than ten pairs of $10 jeans".Our parents are mystified.

Pair in a sentence as a verb

You can't just say - take any B1 nor paired with R1, look for another R1 not paired with B1, now exchange the reds in these two pairs, and carry on in this fashion until you're done.

It's two orders of magnitude more volatile than a legitimate currency pair like the Dollar/Euro.

For girl-girl pairs \nmean scores for Perceived Competence subscale were also \nhigher for the PUI condition than for either of the GUI or \nTUI conditions.

Although we can't count infinite bags of marbles, we can still "pair them off" by showing some formula or algorithm that says which marbles go in pairs with which ones.

At the time I mostly did software engineering consulting and pair programming, and my clients were small units in mid-to-large size companies.

The best technical interview I ever had involved picking a random Project Euler problem in the hundreds and pair-programming our way through it.

The other method of proving this though, the one where I asked you to explicitly engineer for me a B1-R1 pairing out of the larger pairing of all the six bags... that can still work.

In essence, the claim is: "The site tricked me. I went to buy a single pair of shoes, and in doing so, they actually started taxing my credit card every month, and no one warned me."Folks are right to be skeptical -- a lot of businesses have done this, tried to hide the fact there would be future charges.

If you think about it a little bit, you'll see that you're guaranteed to succeed and eventually pair off all the B1's with all the R1's, because after all you know there's the same number of each, because you _can_ divide by 3.

By lunch on the first day we all had 3+ pages, so he believed us and we implemented the following:Each week, one pair of programmers would be designated the "consulting developers", and a big sign would be put above their desk.

There was a lot of hype about the best new testing methods with RSpec and this new thing called Cucumber, 100% paired programming all the time, 100% TDD, and 110% test coverage, fat-model, skinny-controller, decorators and service-based architectures, and on and on.

With infinite bags, it becomes much trickier to prove that you can do this every time, and you need some way to ensure that "carry on until you're done" actually carries you to the end of the task, instead of getting you stuck in some sub-infinity of pairings without finishing all of them.

Ensures the system can survive any failure * VLC, Unity3D, Windows, 3D Studio Max and many more applications phone home crashes, which allows developers to quickly patch frequent issues * Code reviews and pair programming ensure no one person's mistake can break critical code sections * Similarly, multiple people should sign off on copy written.

They do report significant gender effects in the way of collaboration, which could be relevant for Osmo:"While all gender pairings’ mean scores on the Interest and \nEnjoyment subscale were nearly the same for the TUI \ncondition, the boy-boy pairs had significantly higher scores \nthan the girl-girl and girl-boy pairs for the GUI condition.

"I'm just a smart guy with a fresh pair of eyes who spent a few weekends reading undergrad textbooks and skimming pubmed".Not: "we're a large company with deeply-interested professionals who've made this their life's work, our own multi-million dollar labs and decades of accumulated experience in the development, testing, validation and manufacture of temporary food substitutes".