ontologically

I mean, let's turn the question perhaps into one that is ontologically similar: What about multiverses?

What first came to mond was that ontologically framing a technical question is difficult.

It's ontologically subjective but epistemologically objective, in the sense that we can ask questions and observe behavior.

The belief is that since nature is also self-consistent and ontologically hierarchical that by working inside a parallel symbolic system we can discover aspects of nature we never knew existed.

But I don't think it's ontologically possible for a person to own something like these logos.

All observers consistute an ontologically distinct mental reality[1], which by postulation is describable in terms of matter, and so a fortiori describable by quantum mechanics.

What they're trying to do is address Copenhagen indeterminacy by assuming that the collapse of the wavefunction involves the ontologically similar definition of mental states.

Which is to say I've been thinking about writing and wondering if it makes sense to think of programming as ontologically distinct.

The idea of even classifying AI is ontologically invalid...

#Logy/moderation logy means we realistically have time and space (<3) )) ) for ontologically scoping deeper classes and customs freeing your from repeating isolation.

For where, ontologically speaking, are they located?

No, it's a necessary consequence of the fact that the observable macrostates we care about can be composed of many, many ontologically-basic microstates in any reductionist ontology.

We have multiple "true" theories which are ontologically and mathematically incompatible (see for example quantum mechanics and general relativity).

The latter seems, to use one of Quine's insults, "ontologically profligate." Maybe the debate between free will and determinism is just an artifact of language.

This assumes that "goodness" is an irreducible, ontologically basic property.

For one thing, however much you might like your cubicle (read: "virtual reality"), it is ontologically dependent on outdoors (read: real life).

Ontologically it means that something's begun.