non-autonomous

They could be so strong so as to make driving non-autonomous cars more expensive for those that care to.

Currently, the real estate required for non-autonomous vehicles is typically more than two spots for each car.

Autonomous vehicles will be electric but so will some (perhaps a smaller fraction of) non-autonomous vehicles.

Same way you stop an non-autonomous one >Will terrorists use autonomous cars as delivery mechanisms for what were formerly suicide bombs?

Maybe the drivers of non-autonomous cars wouldn't be safe...but that's the same situation as today.

Yeah, it has higher failure rates but it's not a dealbreaker for non-autonomous use cases.

How would you feel about a move to regulate non-autonomous vehicle ownership more closely?

It isn't until Smalltalk where we get the non-autonomous objects that we are familiar with today.

Qwen3.5-plus has been my go-to model for non-autonomous chatbot that runs arbitrary code and shell commands on my local machine for one-off tasks (unlike Claude Code).

Things like junctions/intersections would be much better managed (we might even be able to make them free-flowing on roads where non-autonomous vehicles were banned).

Compare to autonomous driving which needs to take into account road users (non-autonomous), traffic laws, visualization, etc and it's obvious why drones are more efficient and easier to program.

> How would you feel about a move to regulate non-autonomous vehicle ownership more closely?

I'm not as worried about completely autonomous AI/robots, as I am about government-controlled "autonomous" robots, or even non-autonomous ones.