mosques

It means schools, mosques, shops and rocket launching facilities are one and the same thing.

The media is at the same time much, much milder about the intolerance preached in many mosques, so they have insane double standards.

It still gets taught at mosques in Tamil Nadu though no uses it any more.

We have freedom of religion, and European citizens who believe in Islam, so there should be absolutely no problem in having mosques.

There do exist masjids that aren't mosques, mostly in non-sunni brands of islam).

Somewhere are people who helped planned the Paris attacks who are dismayed the French public didn't immediately firebomb all visible mosques in revenge to spark chaos.

Historically mosques were fortresses first, and had several other functions.

Do you believe Catholic churches (or monasteries/convents) outside of Italy / Vatican City, mosques outside of Saudi Arabia, and temples outside of Israel are also novelties?

Greater London has 650k Muslims, and around 411 mosques.

And these aren't just formal organisations, they often have deep ties to the community, particularly with direct links to formal networks of all mosques in the country.

They actively house rockets/terrorists in schools, mosques, and hospitals.

They store these weapons in houses, in mosques, in hospitals in the hopes that civilians die and then useful people like you come and post these comments.

Mosques are very underrepresented, considering the number of muslim, and they have to fight for every single one.

>>Mosques are very underrepresented, considering the number of muslim, and they have to fight for every single one.

Mosques can still be built, just without minarets.