matasano

One could argue that because of reputation and market share, Matasano gets customers who prioritizes security, making such vulnerabilities less occurring for Matasano customers.

Is it as good as having 'tptacek or someone else from Matasano looking at it as a human?

Many of you will be familiar with NCC Group's legacy US names - Matasano Security, iSEC Partners, and Intrepidus Group.

In late 2012, Matasano was acquired by NCC Group joining iSEC Partners and later Intrepidus Group.

It was: Certicoms ECC patents got them acquired for roughly 7 times what Matasano got.

Both of the articles have some flaws (that Matasano one is really bad/dated actually).

I think this is how Matasano recruits and it makes a lot of sense to me.

This month, there will not be a post from Matasano Security.

Effective today, there will no longer be a Matasano Security.

We did work for the program in my last couple years at Matasano (I imagine Tom Ritter's NCC Cryptography Practice is continuing it).

I've come across the Matasano one before and felt it might have been a bit outdated in light of recent efforts with WebCrypto.

At Matasano was Ruby the primary scripting language?

Funny: "Matasano" in Chile is a slang term for doctors, and not a particularly nice one.

I chose to criticize the matasano article as "dated" because some of the positions it takes are no longer accurate.

I worked with Neal when he was an intern at Matasano, and yes he is very good.

I didn't argue that health care retarded Matasano; I do a good enough job of that on my own.

I think, per the other comments, your background makes a difference (assuming you're talking post-Matasano) in how the message was delivered.