macchu

For example, all the famous pictures of Macchu Picchu are taken from behind that little hut you see about 50 feet above where the camera is.

The focus of this trip was on rural health and included shaman rituals and hiking around Macchu Pichu.

And this is a much more critical event to another persons development than going to see Macchu Picchu.

At Macchu Picchu they still allow tourists to climb all over the site.

I cannot afford a vacation in Macchu Picchu, but it does not detract from my feeling of being lucky/unlucky.

I could imagine seeing these anywhere from Santa Monica to NYC or Lake Tahoe to Macchu Pichu.

Also Macchu Pichu is 600 years old, and the theory of the Richat structure housing a city assumes it was destroyed 12,900+ years ago.

It doesn't matter if you can't take a vacation in Macchu Picchu.

There are some fascinating ruins apart from Macchu Picchu like Moray which they believe was a greenhouse where each steppe is a different microclimate.

I always think of mortarless marvels like macchu Picchu when I think of Mayan architecture.

If you go to say La Paz or Macchu Pichu expecting scorching weather based on that graphic you are going to have a bad time.

For example, recently I bought train tickets to Macchu Picchu in Peru and I was only able to do so in Safari.

Misleading title - the builders did not "intentionally" locate the fault sites, then built Macchu Picchu there.

Heh, when I went to Peru (Macchu Picchu, one of the most beautiful places I've ever visited), they ate Guinea Pigs (called "cuy" locally).

And if your choice was between spending $4T to go to Macchu Picchu yourself, or look at pictures on Google Maps for free - you would almost certainly not spend $4T "for the experience".

Macchu Picchu and Angkor Wat was built with stones that were cut with 'laser precision', according to 4o, and a 4k video on youtube showing it's just a bunch of clumsily cut rock is far less convincing than chatGPT for somebody who's looking for validation rather than actual arguments.