longer-lasting

I think the sentiment is pretty clear: this doesn't mean we need better Li-ion batteries per se, but either we need hugely longer-lasting sources of power, or we need hugely more efficient displays/radios/processors.

For example, if users buy the more-expensive longer-lasting product, then that's a sign that those users feel they need it.

If all they're taking the drug for is to clear the pain of withdrawal, why not prefer simpler, longer-lasting opiates?

Unless they've engineered a much longer-lasting heating system, this significantly limits the window of risk.

Finance has a smaller, but less risky and longer-lasting leverage - invested money.

I know pacemakers use Lithium-Iodine battery chemistry, which is much safer and longer-lasting than Lithium-Ion.

But let's not forget that until recently heating was extremely primitive, houses had almost no insulation, and European winters seem to have been colder and longer-lasting.

Edible cannabis seems a lot safer in that respect but of course it's harder to gauge the dose, it's longer-lasting due to the different metabolic pathway, and it doesn't have the instant gratification of smoking.

The thinness is the critical problem, and to be honest with most consumer electronics (phones especially; please give me a larger, replaceable battery), I wish they would stop the race to the bottom and instead deliver more functional and longer-lasting productions.

Ultimately the solution is longer-lasting less obsolete products, but that's "bad for the economy" when the economy is transaction-focused.

"longer-lasting love" Isn't it funny how cheap love is now?