Invisible used in a sentence

Invisible in a sentence as an adjective

It is an invisible world to them. child's play.

This is by far the biggest part of the iceberg, made invisible by the fact that these people drop out of statistics. 2.

After all, the consequences are invisible. Well, not this time.

Other 'incompatible' classes are invisible to us. There is a whole world of people in this country that he wouldn't even be able to talk to.

There's an invisible salary cap for software engineers. By the time a software engineer is in their 30's, they've jumped a few times and are already close to the maximum.

If they only knew how much traction comments that are almost invisible and lower on the page get. This is like being a Democratic analyst on Fox News with all the anti-MS and pro-Apple/Google bias on here.

Now you had to diagnose problems in a system that had been designed to be "invisible," meaning it was hostile to exploration. Why will Meteor be different?

But invisible - moving the servers, or hidden below deep layers of customized software in the consumer devices. The linux ideology - nowhere to be seen.

Sometimes the market has more than one invisible hand. Edit: A good point by a fellow commentor - no independent investigation has been performed into the QWest story.

There are infinite ways Google's information asymmetry could be exploited, and most of them would be completely invisible and 100% effective. Thats why I'm glad we have Sergey and Larry running under the banner of "Don't be Evil."

The result is that things I might be more interested in from smaller projects are effectively invisible. Facebook has done a really good job solving the problems of information overload and would provide a good model.

The effort required from site operators is small, and the whole system is invisible to end-users. Fixing the CA hierarchy is a lot less sexy than ground-up rewrites of the whole Internet security model.

The person in whom Its invisible agony reaches a certain unendurable level will **** herself the same way a trapped person will eventually jump from the window of a burning high-rise. Make no mistake about people who leap from burning windows.

TL;DR: When you are depressed, it seems like the air is thick and heavy, it seems like every ray of light is trying to push you down onto your shadow, it seems like every movement you do is being countered by an invisible force and requires you to use more energy. All your thoughts are polluted with a dark tint.

Pollack is put out, since all the whiners where invisible when he was asking for new maintainers several months ago. Also, whiners who neither helped then and aren't stepping up to help now reek of entitlement: what right do they enjoy to Pollack's continued donation of time and money, just because he historically provided something the community liked?

Com/ Quoting: Ghostery is your window into the invisible web tags, web bugs, pixels and beacons that are included on web pages in order to get an idea of your online behavior. Ghostery tracks the trackers and gives you a roll-call of the ad networks, behavioral data providers, web publishers, and other companies interested in your activity.

You became "invisible". Other "invisible" people also had to ignore you, iirc, otherwise their sentence would be extended. It was painted quite vividly as an extremely cruel form of punishment. Personally, I find it extremely distasteful, for the sake of not dealing with people complaining about being banned, to simply make them invisible.

Overriding it with a bunch of unsupported animated nonsense that requires Javascript and invisible divs and such is a recipe for disaster from a usability and accessibility stand point.

Many aspects of US society today are organized under the assumption that if every individual pursues what is in his/her best financial interest, the "invisible hand of the free market" will produce the best possible outcome for everyone. Yet here we have reputable doctors acting in their self interest, and the result is that they are ordering unnecessary surgeries for financial gain. Meanwhile, patients are essentially unable to protect themselves against this travesty. Maybe in this case the invisible hand cannot be seen because it is not there?

The quality and content of HN seems remarkably improved in the last year: - Karma became invisible - Steve Jobs passed away - Gruber posts started getting flagged - Android came neck and neck with iOS then surpassed it, then Apple started suing - a few overhyped, overvalued, overinvested-in companies popped in very public ways In fact the discussions about the above things have been some of the most spirited, invigorating discussions on HN in a long while. But the other posts and discussions on other topics started getting better as well.

Quote Examples using Invisible

There will be major, commercial service providers such as Facebook-type social media hubs, major news sites but there will also be an invisible internet that is everything internet used to be, and in addition to that encrypted, anonymous, and untraceable. How it shows most prominently at the moment is file sharing. Setting the endless copyright debates aside, what happens is that governments and large companies want to interfere with the privacy of what citizens are doing with their own bits. They say copying is theft while citizens consider twiddling their own bits a private matter that's none of anyone else's business. The citizens don't understand that while it's de facto legal to form a sneakernetthe actual legal status probably varies from place to place but nobody has ever been sued for sneakernet filesharing because nobody else never knows about itit's illegal to form a filesharing network over the internet. I don't promote or demote filesharing per se: it's just the cutting edge where the future trends will show years before they land elsewhere and that's what it makes it so interesting. A marginal slice of file sharing has already moved to anonymous darknets but in a few years and after a few more bad copyright/freedom-of-speech incidents with bad publicity, there will eventually be a breakthrough and the whole filesharing activity will go underground en masse. When the masses go for it, the capacity and availability of invisible darknets will raise in orders of magnitude. That means there will be other providers in the anonymous networks as well, websites and services. There already are some, from anonymous wikis, anonymous project pages to anonymous forums but currently those are playgrounds. That is not so in ten years: there will be a major "bazaar" going on underground. While everything is anonymous and untraceable, everything is also secure. An online bank could very well operate in the anonymous network because the traffic is already cryptographically signed, and users can enjoy strong authentication if they wish to or remain a pair of anonymous public/private keys. At that point the traditional grasp of internet control is lost. The institutions governing the internet and the copyright and whatnot are faced with a big dilemma: do they dare to ban and make illegal anything that's not specifically permitted on the internet and if so, how to go about it in actuality. Do they lobby for laws that only allow ISPs to let citizens connect to a http proxy that validates all traffic to be "approved"? Do they extend the charges for any use of the invisible internet that is deemed illegal, to cover all users of the invisible internet?

Anonymous