inviolable

That depends on the goals; you could define the Three Laws[1] as inviolable goals.

The premises of the mission shall be inviolable.

Seriously?I have a hard rule that after many painful lessons is now inviolable.

They purport to outline absolute, logically inviolable reasons that a given language is "bad".

This was my view, and I saw nonviolence in the Gandhian model not as an inviolable principle but as a tactic to be used as the \nsituation demanded.

This is a topic that libraries have known about for a long time, and most libraries have policies like "privacy of library users is and must be inviolable", and to "destroy [patron records] when no longer needed.

Somewhat paradoxically then, "truth" becomes approximations of correct, rather than the traditional inviolable assertion.

The idea that a creator has an absolute moral right to control of their characters is a fairly recent one, and it certainly isn't a widely respected one -- imagine how many movies, books, etc. would have never been written if people had considered Dracula, Don Quixote, Frankenstein's Monster, Othello, etc. to be inviolable property of their authors.

As madison wrote, "The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments; and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable", I wonder if he could have imagined the newly formed government would wander this far... I applaud Ecuador for bravely standing against yet another example of US imperialism and violation of human rights.