interlingua

In interlingua, by contrast, you analyze the input sentence to form a language-independent representation of the sentence's meaning.

Europe really needs a unified language -- it could be English, French, German, or even Interlingua or Esperanto.

This didn’t prove that Google Translate is using English (or some other interlingua), but at least demonstrates doesn’t not use one.

Esperanto and Interlingua are useful for facilitating communication between people, acting as geography-blind APIs.

Esperanto could work, or even Interlingua but how about Lojban get even a few native speakers before proposing it as THE language of international communication.

By using a unified 384d Interlingua vector space and Edge Caching, TZP allows agents to exchange a short pointer (TrexID) instead of re-sending full context windows.

However, if we restrict ourselves to one small domain, interlingua can work.

Regarding constructed languages, I like Interlingua the best, but nobody knows it.

For an interlingua candidate I see this more as a drawback.

Esperanto and Interlingua both use that convention.

The Wikipedia folks are working on some sort of openly developed interlingua that can be edited by humans, in order to populate Wikipedias in underrepresented languages with basic encyclopedic text.

I think Interlingua would be even more interesting to you then, since it was designed to be comprehensible to ordinary speakers of French, Spanish and Italian without any special knowledge.

It would be more like an interlingua between symbolic goals and executable semantics, verbose, unambiguous, self-modifying, auto-verifiable, evolving alongside the agents that use it").

That was one of the big claims by Google, that Google Translate had created its own "interlingua" thanks to which it could translate between languages for which it doesn't have parallel corpora: Following several months of testing, the researchers behind the AI have seen it be able to blindly translate languages even if it's never studied one of the languages involved in the translation.

Interlingua took a better path, but it targeted the only continent that doesn't need it.

This is on the same league with arguing against Esperanto in favor of Interlingua.

Spanish is a beautiful language, I speak some myself, it's probably better than Esperanto or the more European-focused Interlingua, but...