naturalistic

Perl is what you might call a semi-naturalistic programming language. That is Perl's greatest strength and its greatest weakness.

Highly processed foods, and just how badly our bodies deal with the latter This sounds like the naturalistic fallacy.

A naturalistic fallacy[1] if I ever saw one. Nature is grossly unfair.

And it doesn't matter, because that is just the naturalistic fallacy. Something being "natural" doesn't make it good, and something being "artificial" doesn't make it bad.

"The naturalistic fallacy", sometimes with a dash of "argument from antiquity". I think Yoga is more subject to this than some other forms of exercise, except maybe running.

It is the quintessential naturalistic fallacy. It amazes me time and again how people can take the term seriously, which only demonstrates how dangerous it is.

[1] I work from naturalistic assumptions. For those who believe in an afterlife: imagine your soul being destroyed instead of living happily ever after.

Perhaps I am falling into the same naturalistic fallacy here, but as far as I can tell, it's normal and good for people to test authority on a regular basis.

>OO is accessible because it is much more naturalistic than FP It is interesting that you pre-suppose that is the case. My experience with teaching people programming with no prior experience is that OOP is not accessible at all, and FP comes quite naturally.

[0]\n\nLook at this from a naturalistic framework. Jesus, for instance, may have simply been a very eccentric man who behaved linguistically and personally in ways that were revolutionary.

This finding provides the first evidence from a naturalistic setting of the importance of cues of being watched, and hence reputational concerns, on human cooperative behaviour.

It's not though, death is natural and inevitable You committed the naturalistic fallacy. Also, inevitability isn't a justification for bad things happening.

\nConclusion: This small, open label naturalistic study shows that up to six low dose ketamine infusions can safely be given within an existing NHS clinical structure to patients who continue their antidepressants. The response rate was comparable to that found in RCTs of single doses of ketamine in antidepressant-free patients but took slightly longer to develop."

Pardon me if I'm being too cynical or if I'm missing the point, but all I see is a CEO saying that young employees should work more for lower wages, with some naturalistic, late XIX century imagery of bravery fighting in a war, the most desperate people, bringing out the beast, horses running wild.

Calling the "naturalistic fallacy" a fallacy is a bit of an overstretch IMO, sure natural=better is not a rule true 100% of the time, but nevertheless until sufficient evidence has not been accumulated that some of the adjustments we make to our lifestyle are not harmful to us health-wise avoiding them is not an unreasonable heuristic to follow. One example is how it became clear in the last years in nutritional science that in general the more processed the food is the more harmful it is for us.