instrumentalist

There's no need to be an instrumentalist, and being one is not a way of overcoming bias.

Make anyone a vocalist or instrumentalist and hose these assholes.

I have a friend who is a very talented multi-instrumentalist but who also has hearing loss in the low frequency range.

There are tons of less commonly used instruments but they are usually played as a side project by another instrumentalist.

I deliberately chose the word "instrumentalist", not "artist".

Thomas has a very instrumentalist / consequentialist / realist view of things.

If you make your philosophy austere and instrumentalist enough, there is no ownership, only physical control.

The chills one experiences being proximate to a virtuoso instrumentalist...even the best tube amp speaker set up does not fool a close listener for more than a few seconds.

Good explanations are another matter altogether as Deutsch points out in his criticism of the instrumentalist view of quantum theory.

Even moderately sized chamber orchestras can manage "ok" with maybe a lead instrumentalist kicking off a tune with an exaggerated nod -- you just rehearse a lot and listen to each other.

I am a rubbish instrumentalist, but do hang around with a hell of a lot of musicians, and 'how long was that' does seem to be one of the most commonly asked questions of each other when they are in a studio.

I’m a multi-instrumentalist, I’ve played professionally in weddings, bars, played buckets in a street performing band, and continue to study music, actively taking classical piano lessons, composing songs.