inhabited

It has been founded artificially on a land that was predominantly inhabited by muslims, surrounded by countries predominantly inhabited by muslims.

The red zones can be inhabited but most of the ground is either polluted either completely destroyed.

I'm pretty sure that the village is actually inhabited now and has been for many years.

It is far from obvious that they should be inhabited by more than one proof.

You see, before the colonial era, we the Baining's inhabited the whole of the land of East New Britain.

What about the fact that the worst areas (where said crimes are committed) of the densely populated urban swaths are disproportionately inhabited by African-Americans?

This isn't even theoretical, this is an argument that actually happens in the real world, just not in the bubble inhabited by Gerrand, apparently.

Previously everything was handled through emails and windows network drive (and this from an org with tens of subsidiaries and presence on every inhabited continent).

They arrived at an inhabited star system - which had been populated by humans departed from Earth a little after them, but on faster-than-light vessels.

Both of the areas you cited have traditionally been inhabited by not-so-well-to-do Indians which could be one of the reasons why they aren't well maintained.

The issue isn't with the example you gave, but with the idea in general that being able to produce a term of a given type in Haskell means that that type is necessarily inhabited.

But (in the world I inhabited 15 years ago) heroin was very rare.

For more detail see this post addressing the meme "Mars is the only knonw planet inhabited solely by robots".

I'm not sure why a followup post said "No" as if there's any evidence to support that we can destroy human life on earth...much less habitable or even just inhabited lands.

These places were inhabited by what volunteers described as intelligent “beings”, “entities”, “aliens”, “guides”, and “helpers”...

Try walking around the wealthiest area of any city, and the patterns will be very different from "normal" areas: Flats will be larger, and someone at home does not necessarily mean the building will look very lit; more people have second homes, or travel a lot, or work late, and so an inhabited flat may still have people at home more rarely.