Indiscriminately used in a sentence

Indiscriminately in a sentence as an adverb

The point of making the billion dollars yourself is having a say in where it gets spent, not in "giving it all away" indiscriminately.

A helicopter with crew costs over $1000 per hour, so we know you know we aren't being monitored indiscriminately from above.

Manning leaked a large swath of information indiscriminately.

Further, I honestly think it undermined the democratic process to indiscriminately make it all public.

When you attempt to indiscriminately remove them all you almost invariably end up with something sterile and far less interesting.

When the machines are procured, even larger hunks of data are indiscriminately shoved through black box implementations of algorithms in hopes that meaning will emerge on the far side.

They attack indiscriminately, and in every case make fun of any idiotic security practices.

On the other hand, the cases of potential abuses and dragnet surveillance capturing everything indiscriminately are extremely worrying.

We're lucky that, as Bruce Schneier frequently points out with respect to airline hijackings, there really aren't as many terrible people out there wanting to indiscriminately **** hundreds or thousands as we all fear there are.

And that is indirectly accomplished by indiscriminately bombing civilians.

But that does not mean a private party should be able to indiscriminately sue anyone around who happens to be offering services that involve some form of money handling, or their investors, for the results of the existing system.

" As described above, holding out is accomplished when one communicates to the public, or a segment to the public, that transportation services are indiscriminately available to any person with whom contact is made.

"Your ill-advised actions also play to some of the most basic fears among some citizens, which is that a police officer may indiscriminately exercise his or her power in violation of their rights," Urquharts discipline letter continues.

Unfortunately, you can't just enhance memory formation and learning related neurotransmission, you amplifiy cholinergic transmission indiscriminately everywhere.

I posted the following comment in another thread[0], but it is even more relevant here: The other thing that is so worrying about the US having the communications of people around the world indiscriminately is that it basically means that the NSA is in a position to blackmail any citizen of any country that enters into a position of power in that country.

Bjarni from the Mailpile team here.>This is an interesting proposal and sounds like a significant improvement over the current centralized key-server model.>The main quibble I have with it, is it seems there's no concern given to the privacy of user's communications - the proposed gossip mechanism seems designed to indiscriminately tell everyone who I am communicating with.

If the US is nowhere near being an authoritarian police state, at what point will US become a authoritarian police state?When they have **** lists without any trial, jury or judge?When they keep prisoners in jail indefinitely without a trial?When they torture prisoners?When state officials lie to the public?When state officials lie to public representatives?When the secret police interfere with lawyers communications and interferes with legal cases?When the secret police silence individuals that want to inform about abuse?When the secret police use surveillance for blackmailing?When the state use strip searches and surveillance indiscriminately against the population, including children?When the state implement state censorship?When they use force against peaceful demonstrators?When they utilize military resources against peaceful demonstrators?When they seize bank assets without any trial, any intention of a trial, or even without ever formally serving the individual with criminal papers?Please state what criteria we should use, so we can have a final definition of what an authoritarian police state is.