indicies

The IP you know and love contracts over the covariant and contravariant indicies of two rank-1 tensors (vectors).

Presumably they never look at such indicies so they'd only be liable after someone notified them of infringement.

Perhaps the original process can recursively assign indicies by spawning two children worker processes which are given a range of indicies to work on (who then create their own assignment processes).

You need a metric to do this so you can raise one of the contravariant indicies to be covariant.

Sure you can match the user's query using these indicies but the inference thereafter certainly must be very weak.

Australia is too closely ranked to other countries with successful startup ecosystems in the major market and freedom indicies.

Further to that, Australia ranks well in most global indicies for business startup, running a business and open markets.

The Economist had a pretty scathing tear-down of indicies in the issue week before last.

If I understand their approach, they are building semantic indicies over large sets of documents (e.g.

What it does not help with is the much bigger problem of how to migrate the data, indicies, backups, replication, etc.

My contention is treating indicies-based management as some tedious, manual workaround.

It's fine as long as you don't manipulate the indicies.