hygienic

Scheme macro is hygienic, which make certain type of macro impossible to be done (those that capture itself).

The function exposed from C (with the inline asm) can be naked, though, assuming you are hygienic.

In Scheme there is a lot of concern about hygienic macros that don't mess up the namespace.

For senior good developers, an employee friendly culture is an hygienic factor, not a competitive factor.

The wording makes me think that's it's purely about allowing non-hygienic macros[1] in some sensible way.

Nowadays, it's expected that water should be served in bottles; it's supposedly more hygienic and it's certainly more profitable for restaurants.

Also depend on who you ask, hygienic macro is slightly more annoying to use.

Do you confront them about the hygienic threat you perceive from their intergluteal clefts?

There are some efforts to breed better hygienic behavior into bees, so they clean out parasitized brood or clean themselves of the mites.

Handling dotted pairs is rather trivial compared to, say, getting hygienic macros right.

Ruby's metaprogramming features are a far cry from Scheme's hygienic macro system.

I reconcile both thinking of culture as an hygienic condition, and talent as an order winner.

Heck, even the Lisp community is divided whether or not the macros should be "hygienic".

Scheme also has "CL" like macros that are hygienic.

Hygienic R5RS-style macros are nice and all that, but only for petty language extensions, and they're a noticeable obstacle if you want to implement more complex, deeply staged DSLs.