hijackers

There is a vastly greater prevalence of drivers travelling over the speed limit than there are of airline hijackers.

Yet most passengers still survive hijackings, because just as before 9/11 most hijackers have no interest in committing suicide.

Remember, a lot of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudis, and a lot of the funding came from Saudi Arabia.

The only people who deserve to die like this are the writers of web hijackers and viruses, multiple times.

But now that they know the possibility everyone is going to die in an intentional crash, hijackers have no chance.

None of the 9/11 hijackers' nationalities are represented (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, UAE), excepting Lebanon.

Paying browser hijackers isn't exactly the hallmark of a resurgent and reputable internet company.

It's trivially easy to distinguish vehicles travelling over the speed limit than hijackers.

Our results show that this stateful forwarding plane can successfully circumvent prefix hijackers, avoid failed links, and utilize multiple paths to mitigate congestion.

The other 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi (rich), the UAE (rich), and Lebanon, a solidly middle-income country with per-capita income comparable to Mexico.

It didn't cause passengers to risk their lives to stop future hijackers.

This helps to prevent hijackers and malware from intercepting a data transaction.

This mentality of installing random "utilities" and search hijackers on PC's needs to end.

I was wrong - apart from the odd inept wannabe bomber (the "shoe bomber" for example), passengers generally don't overpower hijackers.