harasser

Now, if the harasser is 2 continents away, it's going to get circular filed.

If the harasser is two continents away, though, you can just ignore the message.

Intent is irrelevant in harassment; it's the environment the harasser creates and the feelings the victim feels.

The harasser looks like he could have been the girl's boyfriend to someone on the outside.

It's entitled to do this to anyone who is not a harasser, but someone's gotta explain that it's not okay.

He was chairman of an organization, and that organization was listing on their resources page a block list that labeled him an harasser.

However, if the harasser turns out to be in the same state or even the same county, the police will care a lot.

You simply have to show the harasser that their harassment doesn't bother you.

Because of the way this article was presented, I've reserved forming an opinion of Ellis or her alleged harasser.

Certainly I agree the definition of a 'hostile work environment' does not hinge on the harasser admitting fault or intent.

Hmm, if you are a harasser by trying to talk to someone...

As discussed in a following section, this issue depends in part on the identity of the harasser and the context in which the harassment occurred.

In addition, labelling Randi as a "harasser" is a common gamergate tactic.

Though if you want some entertainment, your harasser is on this thread as "Masonlove" and appears to be just as entertaining as you described.

She didn't say "Leave me alone if I ask you to." She once wrote that a man is a harasser for trying: "If you are a strange man trying to talk to me on my way to or from work, when I am commuting alone, you are a harasser, pure and simple."

Except that an enforcement of a real-name policy will make it even easier to abuse online users, since now a harasser (or "troll", if you will) has that much more information to go on when doxxing or otherwise imposing offline consequences for online activities.