gish-gallop

Again, you can answer your own question by reading the tiny thread, instead of responding with even more gish-gallop.

Multi-paragraph gish-gallop answers that say absolutely nothing, and liability for truth deferred to the machine, shrugging shoulders of metal and silicon.

Nope, and you should read the rest of the thread before replying with gish-gallop.

Also, you can't claim cherry-picking as invalid against gish-gallop.

I think people can also gish-gallop unintentionally; especially in online discussion threads.

The OP's comment is an obvious gish-gallop.

To avoid the cost/expense of a jury trial, public prosecutors threatens to press for a large number of charges or some very serious charges - carrying the potential of very long sentences - a sort of Gish-gallop approach.

I have noticed a couple of posters in this thread posting a gish-gallop of links (mostly from discredited sources) purporting to prove something, but one sees upon inspection that they in fact do nothing of the sort.

Also related - Gish-gallop During a typical Gish gallop, the galloper confronts an opponent with a rapid series of specious arguments, half-truths, misrepresentations, and outright lies, making it impossible for the opponent to refute all of them within the format of the debate.[2] Each point raised by the Gish galloper takes considerably longer to refute than to assert.