gapjumpers

It won’t let me take the audition without getting a LinkedIn account and connecting it to GapJumpers.

You (www.gapjumpers.me) might not be a recruiting agency yourself but your website says Dobly is a client...

We (www.gapjumpers.me) are trying to solve the gender diversity issue in tech by using blind auditions as a first filter.

Given that, it was extra-neat for me reading here about GapJumpers putting similar ideas in action.

This is why the time has come for blind auditions like GapJumpers offers - helps to avoid all bias when deciding who to interview.

Drop me a line at versal@gapjumpers.me and to arrange for an interview.

If not, email mck@gapjumpers.me and let's discuss your fit for the role.

Why assume that selecting candidates for interview based on the results of a blind audition/technical challenge approach like the GapJumpers model wouldn't also yield fantastic candidates who fit into the culture?

I don't how GapJumpers fits into what you're saying.

If you have some of your previous JS development work to showcase, please do share it in your email application to kedar@gapjumpers.me The next step in the process would be a technical challenge with our CTO at Versal.

It all looks nice until we get numbers from groups like GapJumpers that institute blind auditions for hiring or performance evaluations where evaluator can't identify what group they are.

Your original claim: It all looks nice until we get numbers from groups like GapJumpers that institute blind auditions for hiring or performance evaluations where evaluator can't identify what group they are.

GapJumpers' blind auditions, for example, seem to indicate that the "women aren't interested in tech" assertion is less true than people want it to be.

Now that I've googled "gapjumpers" and seen what it is, I'm very inclined to give far less credence to the claims of nickpsecurity because I now know that gapjumpers is a startup selling a product based on their claims and not some non-profit funding independent academic resource with all the hallmarks of good science.

=== Re: Gapjumpers Now that I've googled "gapjumpers" and seen what it is, I'm very inclined to give far less credence to the claims of nickpsecurity because I now know that gapjumpers is a startup selling a product based on their claims and not some non-profit funding independent academic resource with all the hallmarks of good science.

To be fair, I really should have phrased that as: "Now that I've googled "gapjumpers" and seen what it is, I'm very inclined to give far less credence to the claims of based on work by gapjumpers" The reason I made the jump to putting your name in their is because gapjumpers was your primary reference in a few comments, but no link was provided.

Gapjumpers, Stripe-o-Auth, and analytics viewing requests should be the defacto standard for quick due diligence in the early stages.