game-theoretic

It's easy for people to make promises about the future, but consider this from a game-theoretic point of view.

The purpose of contracts is to solve a game-theoretic problem: it is to our mutual benefit to cooperate in some way.

Or because if everyone's doing it, that probably indicates a necessary systematic game-theoretic incentive.

Plus it's pretty open ended and strategy based, so has a real game-theoretic appear.

That's unfortunate and, given the game-theoretic issues that you already described quite well, I don't see an easy solution.

We fell victim to the same game-theoretic Great Filter as everyone else.

If they have no future brand value to be concerned about, then, from a game-theoretic approach, it's actually a pretty rational profit seeking move.

There are good game-theoretic reasons why that is just a band-aid solution, compared to empowering citizens to apply some form of pressure to officers.

That said the fact of the matter is that the US and Russia do have large nuclear stockpiles, and don't like each other very much, so coordinating simultaneous arms reductions is a tricky game-theoretic dance.

Keep in mind that an adversarial opponent is a game-theoretic abstraction.

There are extremely good game-theoretic reasons to support a policy of allowing full debate on ideas and zero tolerance on attacking the person holding the idea.

Whether or not this is a moral behavior is not the point -- users with ad blockers are game-theoretic parasites that feed off this weakness in the system.

A game-theoretic analogy would be the "non-cooperative" game, defined as "a game where players play independently and where any cooperation must be self-reinforcing".

I think it's more of a game-theoretic "principal-agent-problem avoiding" solution.

Which is to be say that if a mature adult is disgusted by a guy saying 'I'd like to fuck you', it's because they are inherently disgusted by sex but rather they're disgusted by someone making an intimate demand with no protocol, IE making the demand at the wrong time" Which is to say our everyday interactions don't involve the rational constructs of true-false logic but rather are more like game-theoretic maneuvers.

>Of course, the game-theoretic response from the entire internet community is to make sure they never, ever, for any reasons whatsoever, ever click on a link that starts with "sourceforge.net" That's a nice idealistic response, but what about when you can't find a file anywhere else?