frisk

Those not in prison get to enjoy stop and frisk's 100,000/year.

On #1: If the TSA didn't frisk 80 year old men, any smart terrorist would begin recruiting 80 year olds.

"This is also the justification for NYC's "stop and frisk" program which has been in the news so much lately.

I'm so tired of having to say this to folks, but the violent crime rate in NYC has been dropping since before stop and frisk was a policy.

It doesn't affect "stop and frisk" generally in the city, but the specific trespass stops conducted only in the Brox.

That's just "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" from dragnet surveillance, DUI checkpoints, and stop-and-frisk, but phrased slightly differently.

Stop and frisk is a major violation of the rights of those stopped without cause but I have generally viewed it as more of a class issue than a race issue.

Look at that stop and frisk video from new york, they interview a "good" cop, he admits theres lots of wrong things but hey, thats how things are, thats what makes the "good" cops as bad as the other.

In New York, the police will do a stop and frisk, tell people to empty their pockets, and then charge people with displaying the drug in public when they obey the order to empty their pockets.

This is how they did it:>If you think New Yorks stop-and-frisk rule is invasive, try Georgias: Cops can stop anyone at any time for no reason and force him to urinate into a cup. Fifty-three thousand people were stopped on the street in 2007, or about one in 20 of the young men in Georgia.

Both stop and frisk as well as the bag searches on the subway do not pass even a cursory constitutionality examination, but that doesn't seem to bother anyone.

> Have you read how "rights" activist are going to strip NYC cops from doing just that which has resulted in an incredible drop in murders and similar crimes?You are no doubt referring to stop and frisk.

A federal district judge has ruled that the practice of doing stop and frisks in front of private buildings on the premise that the suspect had just or was about to commit a trespass on the private property is unconstitutional.

Recently students at Brown University shouted down a former NYC police commissioner[2] that came to speak at the campus, calling him a "racist" in response to NYC's very successful stop-and-frisk policy designed to get illegal guns off the street.

Remember when you think about policies that seem to only apply to others, like loosening criminal law requirements, sovereign immunity, rampant disregard for the warrant requirement in poor neighborhoods, vehicle checkpoints, and stop-and-frisk: once the precedents are set, there is nothing to keep the government from applying them to you.