forgery

Two nits, both pedantic:An attack on SHA1 that makes certificate forgery viable within the next few years doesn't seem very likely, although over the long term it might be.

There is a reason why the rather nasty Supper at Emmaus van Meegeren forgery was able to fools the experts, and that's that Vermeer wasn't a particularly good draughtsman early on.

Why, why, WHY does no one even question the idea of graphic signatures to begin with?This thing where we scan a piece of paper or paste in a little image has always smacked of forgery to me anyway?

I still remain confident this is no forgery, but the point I'd like to make is that there may in fact be an identity question -- and that is a problem with a technical solution that unfortunately seems not to have been leveraged.

The exchange of dollar bills, including high denomination bills, is currently unregulated and has allowed users to participate in illicit activity, while also being highly subject to forgery, theft, and loss.

I can't argue about ugliness or elegance, but forgery tokens are fundamentally no less elegant than cryptographically secure cookies, which form the basis for virtually all application security on the entire Internet.

Actions are held to be good or bad, not on their own merits, but according to who does them, and there is almost no kind of outrage torture, the use of hostages, forced labour, mass deportations, imprisonment without trial, forgery, assassination, the bombing of civilians which does not change its moral colour when it is committed by 'our' side.