feds

Man, I mean, we talk about National Security concerns and some of the bloviating from the feds on Hn all the time.

S.'s federal system, it is not the responsibility of local law enforcement to simply do whatever the feds them to do.

And to even make a claim that this is somehow worse than the massively private information the Feds lost is laughable.

The Feds can and do keep various states afloat through a variety of transfer institutions.

Indeed, the irony is that many shops full of junior FEDs found databases and stored procs so intimidating that we saw the rise of things like MongoDB.

The feds have been breathing down their necks lately due to too many defects.

In 2009 California's unemployment fund was depleted and the Feds just loaned California money.

You do your 10 years and you do not provide the feds with any information or everyone you love will be offed.

And they don't have police, or Feds or journalists to write about them.

We need more state rights and autonomy, we don't need the Feds to come in and babysit a state.

People get hacked all the time but the data these folks failed to defend is almost as bad as what the Feds lost.

The Feds have tight legislate controls re: what money can be spent on.

Because of the embarrassing back of the Office of Management and Budget, the feds needed a high-profile "win" to give the voting public the appearance of competence.

> "you still have the option of calling in the Feds" sometimes it even works.

Only point I wanted to make is that you still have the option of calling in the Feds.