elect

So, if you elect to click the link, read the article to find out!

What I do think is that democracy has many aspects and free elections of political leaders is just one of them.

Or could it be that it's exactly this sort of reflexive government-bashing that makes it easy for the general public to elect fools and charlatans?

Craigslist could:- kill Padmapper instantly by building a map function to view their listings.- elect not to build a map feature because they think it's trivial and they believe no one cares.

After all, if government is the problem, why would people bother electing representatives who take governing seriously?

If you vote, and you elect dishonest, incompetent politicians, and they get into office and screw everything up, you are responsible for what they have done.

Government can do all sorts of shit to you, but the worse that can happen is that someone somewhere as a scapegoat will be fired, or not re-elected, or not having a bonus in the end of a year.

So, for instance, an investor would loan $50K at 10% interest at a time when the company had little value but could elect to convert at, say, $.50/sh at any time in the sole discretion of the investor.

In this context, under applicable law, Oracle may elect to get statutory damages of $150K for each of the infringements or it may elect to go after what are known as "infringer's profits" - meaning that it would ask the jury to award it damages measured by profits made by Google on account of the infringing acts.

I have followed the economic development and political liberalization of Taiwan closely since the 1970s, having lived there for six years of my life, and it is definitely empirically possible to have politicians who have strong math skills and win elections and to have genuinely free elections and deep protection of civil liberties.

How do you propose to fix this?Pick the crime the federal government is doing and continuing to do under Obama, and tell me, how do you propose to change things so that the federal government can no longer operate outside the law?The argument for electing Obama to end the wars and close guantanimo, etc, made some sense if you believed these were Republican initiatives.

If claims were triable by jury, and if a party elected to have them tried by a jury, this right had to be preserved at all costs and it was regarded as inappropriate for a judge to be too aggressive in attempting to screen and bounce claims at any part of the pretrial stage or to use too much authority at the trial itself to limit the scope of assertable claims.