Ecology used in a sentence

Ecology in a sentence as a noun

They're called ecology blocks, they're about $20 each FOB the cement plant. You want them shipped?

And please, hold off on the ******* criticisms of my version of forest ecology. It's an analogy.

Do we get to pollute the local ecology and go totally-hands off to let the businesses exploit the workers, too? Maybe a little child labor here and there?

This view was prevalent in the world of ecology for decades, and led to all that guff about "nature's balance" and "spaceship earth" that we had to put up with for so long. It turned out that these ideas were based on falsified studies.

I'd rather compete on actual merits than the artificial ecology created by the H1-B system. We already have O and L1 visas, but apparently those limited requirements are too much.

Death is the only guarantee in life and in fact is necessary for human ecology. I too am deeply saddened by this loss, but am supremely grateful that a man like John McCarthy was able to contribute to the humanity's knowledge.

Hydro power is restricted to very specific terrain and has a devastating effect on local ecology... ...

As for ecology side of printing, I used to worry much more about it before. But at some point I realized that I didn't do any math, and from what I can tell, "paperless world" seems to be much more damaging to environment than cutting down trees for paper, and as long as we recycle, paper ain't that bad.

How is a student going to have a hope of understanding theoretical models in behavioral ecology or population genetics without some mathematical training? What E O Wilson is saying is straight out of the bad old days which ended in the 1990s.

When you're the lone Excel fan in a company where everyone else is using 123, even if you love Excel, you can't switch until you can participate in the 123 ecology. If you know that in the absolute worst case that you can still use the product even if it's shut down, then by golly, you have even less of a reason to not switch to it.

Reading this article the one idea that persisted in my head was that this was a case of people not really knowing anything about ecology trying to create an ecosystem. Sure they used the word "Platform" and maybe that was actually the first clue, but what they really wanted was an ecosystem of actors creating increased value for their domain.

It's built around an organic farm rather than a golf course, it's got miles of green space and trails, and a fantastic commitment to ecology and the environment -- for example the outdoor irrigation system is built from gray water from the homes in the community. Also: it's got some great restaurants and about 80% of my diet comes from food that's made within 25 miles of where I live now.

Solar and wind energy are not reliable enough to provide base-load coverage, hydro power is restricted to very specific terrain and has a devastating effect on local ecology, and really the only other option is fossil fuels. At this point, the options literally are nuclear, or fossil fuels.

I suspect we're not going to reach a suitable dtente on police and military surveillance until we've developed a commonly accepted sense of what the Mirror World entails for a constellation of considerations, from energy, economy and ecology to culture and education. This really is the tip of a very big iceberg.

It demonstrates a fundamental ignorance of the relationship between politics and ecology. Many people currently live in an apocalyptic environment.

If that's a serious question, because we're pattern-matching this issue with other ones we're emotionally invested in -- archetypical issues of technological progress and ecology. Pre-existing cached narratives.

I think open source is clearly critical to the modern software ecology, but I wish people would think carefully about why they are doing it in each case, rather than assuming their actions are automatically benign because of a sprinkling of 'open' dust.

And it's one thing to take your employee aside for a blunt conversation, and another to broadcast your criticism from a public stage, a stage where the employee's pride is at stake and yet the realities of politics, PR, and media ecology leave the employee effectively unable to respond in kind. There's nothing dishonest about the phrase "no comment", just as there's nothing dishonest about concealing your body by wearing clothes.