dictatorships

Especially dictatorships often had and have some kind of law that allows the dictator to do anything.

They also historically involve tons of bloodshed and lots of support for dictatorships and friendly lackeys in power worldwide.

Co-ops adhere to democratic principles so, yes, in the context of most corporations (totalitarian/dictatorships) that notion might seem quite radical.

But the functionaries of one of the world's worst dictatorships, and one of Russia's closest satellite states, do get them.

Sometimes dictatorships have mostly good education in all respects that don't threaten the dictatorship.

Meanwhile, surrounding countries are unstable dictatorships which have routinely experienced coup d'etat, murder, and genocide against their own people and their neighbors.

We've learned enough from history that brutal dictatorships end in downfall of the leaders.

Examples might include oppressive dictatorships, bloated bureaucracies, or sweatshops (especially to a child).

Some companies might of course pull from the US market to avoid pulling from the world's dictatorships, but probably not the big American ones.

It's a playbook right out of the best South American dictatorships.

The exact same way they maintain democracy and fascist dictatorships.

> Ecuador isn't some bastion of liberty It never helped establish dictatorships in other countries, so it has that going for it.

You applaud them on a PR strategy that is akin to dictatorships all over the world denouncing opposition as "terrorists" and criminals?

Never mind that Brazil has had its "fair" share of dictatorships.

"High risk" countries with unstable regimes and dictatorships default on their loans to the World Bank and developed countries 2.

It's had free and fair elections since 1987." (so it is 28 years, this is only about 5 years more than nations in Eastern Europe who escaped Soviet Russian dictatorships).