convection

Most "mixing" inside and outside the bubble will be done by convection rather than by diffusion.

The convection in the mantle, on the other hand, is responsible for volcanism and plate tectonics.

If you exclude convection you can easily have such a temperature difference.

This generates heat because you are compressing the air of course but its windy so you've got heat sink vanes in the air flow being cooled by convection.

As it turns out, even on earth's surface, radiation is a more efficient heat transfer method than conduction and convection through the air.

The approach you suggest would be tractable at very low pressure, but at very low pressure convection cooling is ineffective.

Remember the three mechanisms of heat transfer: radiation, conduction, and convection.

It could have less mass, less dissolved gas, or convection currents producing a non-uniform temperature distribution.

I don't think the 2008-present economic crisis was a random freak event, like a hurricane, or caused by immutable laws analogous to atmospheric convection.

Even at that, I'd like to see data comparing conventional forced-air convection cooling of the external heat exchanger and even a comparison to a natural convection solution.

Finally, whether the bomb would have a minor positive effect, a negative effect, or none at all on the storm's convection cycle, one thing is for sure: It would create a radioactive hurricaneIf that isn't an awesome opening scene of a superhero film I don't know what is.

One idea that rears its head almost every hurricane season recently is the notion of bombing a hurricane into submission....Finally, whether the bomb would have a minor positive effect, a negative effect, or none at all on the storm's convection cycle, one thing is for sure: It would create a radioactive hurricane, which would be even worse than a normal one.