conceptually

The test is conceptually super easy, deliberately so, but with a very wide set of possible implementations.

And certainly no reason why it'd be worse than the describe approach, which isn't really all that conceptually different.

Being conceptually slippery enough to get out of any problem comes naturally to skillful people in their fields.

Instagram is pretty close conceptually to Facebook, but most people don't use it as a direct substitute.

Even though one uses the other they are very much not the same thing conceptually or practically.

Networking is challenging, but at least we have a lot of experience with VMs, which are conceptually similar.

At this point in my life, I have an understanding conceptually, but practically I don't care so much.

However, we humans think of things far more conceptually, and we build cognitive connections between things.

I might be mistaken, but I'm hoping that understanding how things work conceptually will change how I in turn write programs.

I think it is actually a good post, and I agree with it conceptually.

What I like about it conceptually is that in a way it treats light as a field rather than as individual directed rays.

I trialled it for about 6 months and found it to be conceptually similar to ZFS but very much it's practical polar opposite.

Yes, it is true conceptually, but: 1) "Who cares" is not the sort of thing you want to say to someone who cares about performance because: 2) Sending the data to buffers for subsequent reduction was the first implementation (2009).

I reckon this to be conceptually similar to the concept of "hibernation" in modern computers; during hibernation, the operating system saves the contents of its virtual memory (physical plus any swapped/paged memory) to non-volatile storage, then reloads that saved state on the next boot.

Conceptually, though in reality/over shorter time frames, it's potentially just as tied to political/human considerations vis a vis the person setting the compensation decision.

Conceptually, it is a single global computer that anyone can access.

Conceptually, I agree with his view that without a better understanding and appreciation for philosophy, humanity is limited by the progress science makes.