colonoscopy

Essentially, getting a license in New York means a two-year financial colonoscopy in the 10th circle of hell.

It looks like propofol is pretty commonly used for colonoscopy sedation in the United States, not without controversy.

To your first question: In the hospital, they use a device similar to that used for a normal colonoscopy.

The future was in the news last week: superbugs spread through colonoscopy procedures in LA.

And third, it's normally done with a swallowed capsule, not with a colonoscopy, which adds risk and unpleasantness for no reason.

If you've had a colonoscopy, you may have been administered ketamine before the procedure.

I had dozens of blood tests, an ultrasound, a gastroscopy, and a colonoscopy with biopsies - nothing.

It's more like he went to McDonald's and specifically requested that they not give him a colonoscopy -- but they did so anyway.

It differs notably from a colonoscopy in that it’s done while fully conscious.

Sometimes it's a simple colonoscopy (like in the article), but other times they are treating people who just had a stroke or a bad accident.

So, when I read: > the woman received a fecal transplant from her overweight but healthy daughter, via colonoscopy I cringed.

One commenter said it would be like 'a free colonoscopy'.

Perhaps the patient opted for the colonoscopy the avoid the "unpleasantness" of swallowing a capsule of fecal matter.

Also, phrases like "about as much as I would trust a priest to give me a colonoscopy" and "the usual Google fanboy response" are inflammatory and inappropriate for substantive discussion, which is what HN calls for.

Edit: just read about differences between IBS-C and D and it definitely sounds like there has been some headway in the last 15 years since I was diagnosed (back then it was mostly a prognosis of "here's a colonoscopy, sorry not much else we can do").