buckshot

Wittens here at least has some core points (amid lots of buckshot, much that various tensions are unresolved).

How can the public trust enforcers who more than coincidentally use excessive force before the usual buckshot is laid out?

Besides, Randall Hyde has shown us the most satisfying way to get rid of printers (buckshot).

And people don't realize it, but 5.56 typically has less overpenetration issues than buckshot.

Bigger efforts, so far sawed-off 2-barrel shotgun loaded with buckshot right into both feet.

However, the worst distraction I have is actually another developer whose voice carries like buckshot out at 12 gauge.

A buckshot hits fewer targets, but packs a bit more punch.

A twelve-gauge with #4 buckshot would do the trick nicely.

There also exist somewhat anomalous theories about buckshot/birdshot being safer.

So, it becomes a question about who can fool the most users with false claims and reach the critical mass required to load buckshot in everybody's blunderbusses.

It’s a specialized form of advertising, I suppose, but perhaps less buckshot.

If you start ejecting little hot BBs at interplanetary speeds, you are creating broad swath of buckshot that will eventually impact something with the force of a missile.

A lot of US under barrel launchers have "factory" buckshot rounds.

Just started Type 56[0]; no wonder people were so uptight about "don't trust anyone over 30" — put in the CR context it sounds much more inflammatory than in the context I had had hearing it; that would explain the buckshot at Berkeley.

If your point is on the semantics regarding the word “murder”, I’ll concede the point (though I still think driving dangerously, looking at a phone, etc where there are people walking and cycling is up there with “well I was bird hunting in downtown manhattan, I didn’t -mean- to hit anybody with buckshot!”).