Biotech used in a sentence

Biotech in a sentence as a noun

As someone in the biotech space, this is by far the biggest factor. When you are dealing with humans, crashes and bugs mean deaths.

You can't just "iterate" and "learn from your mistakes" in biotech. We're talking about life and death here, not some filtered hipster cat photos.

Boston is great too, lots of biotech startups. Overseas is also a good choice, since you'll get the experience of living in another culture, in addition to doing cool work.

Many of the smaller biotech might have poor access to journals, but even then, if you could justify the cost, you could get it. Second of all, yes I trust labs that are trying to recreate data to make a drug out of it.

As someone else in biotech, I agree with your sentiment. I would advise the guys behind this to go back to making social networking and photo sharing apps and leave biotech to those who know what they're doing.

No one will fund a biotech startup that's not backed by MDs or PhDs and academia-approved proof-of-concept results. Good luck getting that when everyone is running for the lifeboats.

Speaking as a biochemist who works in the biotech industry, this looks to be like a gigantic train wreck just waiting to happen. At first glance, I would be convinced these individuals know very little about the science behind their product.

Do FDA administrators write articles about the biotech companies?

For deciding whether two $300-million biotech companies should merge, they're probably the best people out there. It's not that they're "good" at making those calls, but that the companies are so complex and unusual that almost no one is, and they're the most adept at figuring out what's going on amid the chaos.

Usually, the big biotech production plants look a lot like breweries. Giant bioreactors that look like fermentors are hooked up to complex control valves moving fluid from one to the other in the various steps of a complicated process.

Not to mention the disappointment you might feel if you die before the onset of the much hyped biotech revolution, having placed your hopes for happiness in its arrival.

I don't know if it's the same in software, but in a previous life I was a chemist in a biotech startup that had an initially successful IPO. The rank and file were prohibited from cashing out options for six months after the IPO but somehow all the execs were exempt and got rich while the stock was enjoying a post-IPO high. Needless to say, by the time we peons could sell the value had plummeted.

Misguided biotech could effectively end the world as we know it Sam is a smart guy, so I really don't want to come off as sounding like a jerk here, but this grossly underestimates the technical feasibility of creating such a virus. Computer folks routinely overestimate how much biologists actually know about the systems we study.

To echo some of the other comments, non-invasive glucose testing is a 'holy grail' of diabetes research efforts and would be hailed as a major breakthrough--something covered by major media outlets and aggresively pursued by all of big pharma and biotech. A red flag for me is the spontaneous development of something that would be completely groundbreaking.

Forget nanotech, forget good old mechanical engineering, forget aerospace, forget biotech, forget electric, civil, geological engineering. Apparently those don't exist, and the only technology that matters is code.

But yet, I see the importance of biotechnology, specially because I believe bioengineering might be useful, actually using biological things to make constructs, like living buildings, vehicles, batteries, and that sort of things. On this case, I hope monsanto loses. Because they winning would set a too dangerous precedent. Yet, they losing, would not damage biotech too much, you could always invent biotechnology that cannot be easily reproduced.

I'm not sure but it seems like we all would like to see more money and talent going to the 'hard' stuff, whether that is material science, clean tech, biotech, AI, computer hardware, space technology, self driving cars, electric cars, etc etc. That said, it's not a bad thing if a lot of entrepreneurs hit singles right now on this wave, and set themselves up to hit a home run later on a bigger problem.

Quote Examples using Biotech

Infrastructure, food and water, biotech, robotics... YC could be reaching much higher in terms of ambition than it has in the past. This will also mean more failures, but sama is smart and tough enough to hold on through it. But realistically, how could YC get involved with early stage startups in most of these categories? Examples like SpaceX and Tesla don't have minimum viable products. You can't build part of an engine in three months and then show it off on demo day. Creating solutions for these problems at the most rudimentary level will require months if not years of effort and significant financial backing. It's hard for two guys in a garage to build a prototype 10X battery or come up with innovative biotechnology.

Anonymous