bergeron

I never understood this Harrison Bergeron mentality of holding people down in the name of equality.

Harrison Bergeron was a parody of what social darwinists think socialists think.

Personally, I don't find the Harrison Bergeron definition of 'fair' to be particularly useful.

I always think of Harrison Bergeron when I read things like this.

It's the Harrison Bergeron method of pursuing equality.

Does nobody read Harrison Bergeron anymore?

I feel a Harrison Bergeron moment coming on.

I think Harrison Bergeron is about that.

(What little I've found says that they are still working on the details.) I'm hardly calling for a Harrison Bergeron solution.

This is the kind of advantage that can't really be removed without ending up in some sort of Harrison Bergeron type situation, where you pull high-achievers down instead of removing unnecessary impediments to low-achievers (thus increasing total achievement).

We, as a society, may look upon a Harrison Bergeron as the epitome of fitness (mental, physical), but if he's shot down before he can reproduce evolution doesn't care about him, his fitness is nil.

This is a good idea on paper, but it feels a little "Harrison Bergeron".

"so banning the Internet puts an even constraint on students." You should read a story called Harrison Bergeron.

Inequality may be the least-bad outcome given the menu of potential remedies ("Harrison Bergeron" and all that), but it's not a great thing in and of itself.

I guess you're thinking of an unlikely "Harrison Bergeron" type of scenario.

It seems like the desired result is not the strawman, Harrison Bergeron, 100% representative (of what?

The Harrison Bergeron-ing of all things really isn't the way to go.

Must each taxi driver also be named Harrison Bergeron?