atlassian

If there is any confirmation that Atlassian has no idea what developers actually want, that is it right there.

I think Atlassian would naturally be worth more than GitHub, simply due to the larger potential user base.

Have you ever considered a licensing package for customer based installs, similar to how Atlassian licenses Stash as an alternative to BitBucket?

Bitbucket is actually superior in many ways because of its tight integration with Atlassian - the real Microsoft Word of the Developer community.

I work for Atlassian and I agree with the other posters that you're right to be skeptical, but it's worth pointing out that Atlassian has many product offerings other than Bitbucket.

Considering Atlassian valued at 3.3B in last round, GitHub has more potential.

Little failures like this are commonplace among the Atlassian toolset, which is why I don't like using it quite as much.

Doing fine with Slack, Github, and Trello (and no Atlassian products).

The value is a premium considering Atlassian was valued last year at $3.3B even though it has significantly more enterprisey features/ecosystem in the wiki/issue tracker/CI space, although it's not yet owned the social VCS enterprise/SaaS space.

Slack eats memory worse than atlassian products.

> it can easily happen to a smaller company like Atlassian or GH.

In the last 3 places I worked at we all used Bitbucket because their pricing is more reasonable and it integrates nicely with other Atlassian products like Jira.

From the trenches it's hard for me to consider Atlassian the "standard" of modern development focussed organizations.

Atlassian do have products that cater to non-programmers as well, like Jira, HipChat, Confluence and some service desk application.

Atlassian's Github non-Enterprise competitor, Bitbucket, has unlimited private repos for free or $200/enterprise.

Stuff that other companies would probably just use Google Apps, Salesforce, Atlassian, etc.