asterisked

My earliest asterisked comment is 39 days ago, then my most recent upvotable comment is 43 days ago.

The 'accept things' is asterisked with a 'because $deity', which just opens up many more cans of worms.

I'm aware of the context and took no offense when I read it; I asterisked it for 2023.

All of your asterisked points are well-taken, but: do you need that capability?

Your first asterisked point does not at all square with my experience.

The opposite - why unions are good - was not similarly asterisked.

This is referenced in the asterisked comment under each sub-table.

Thanks, I assume some of that is sort of extended, asterisked support though?

Note that almost all of the largest budget deficits since 1990 have been under Republican administrations (Covid years under Trump and Biden were wonky and should probably be asterisked).

The first can easily happen when someone learns about a new finding which contradicts the dogmatic version of science but is entirely consistent with the heavily asterisked actual scientific consensus.

Please see second asterisked point above.

Is this like "one can own land" but really that's asterisked with Eminent Domain (no pun intended)?

It was and is considered “cheating”, so the claim that it was normal should be asterisked.

The first three authors, who are asterisked for "equal contribution", appear to work for Anthropic.

The datasheet does list VoLTE, but its asterisked with a note saying "in planning"