Assailable used in a sentence

Assailable in a sentence as an adjective

But they become far more assailable by social processes, and often without a fight at all.

But with many wise eyes on the ball, even the hardest problems becomes a lot more assailable.

However, once they do, you tend to have a very strong customer base and a less assailable position.

Do you need to have this type of unassailable position if you're going to root out very powerful corrupt peers/figures?

Can't you?You pile specious arguments on top of ad hominem ones, yet still consider yourself assailable on a mountain of logic?

>I will have to assume they are using the sea because its the least likely assailable location by anyone who might seek to take the weapons?Largely political.

Self selection has been more favored and the protests bring to mind the "obvious" but assailable objection "Why not just quit and associate with others more like-minded.

I believe the power of Bayesian thinking is that you can take a subjective prior, which is necessarily assailable in its subjectivity, and then combine it with data.

Their legal and democratic authority is absolutely assailable, within the laws of the United States and within it's democratic processes.

Virtually everything is "ripe for fraud" if your definition includes "is theoretically assailable by the US president, directly or by appointee.

"And it's not like a paragraph of context would have mattered anyways; if you don't know what Rust is, what Wayland is, or what tiling window managers are then you'll need a lot more background knowledge before the article's content begins to be assailable.

All that most maddens and torments; all that stirs up the lees of things; all truth with malice in it; all that cracks the sinews and cakes the brain; all the subtle demonisms of life and thought; all evil, to crazy Ahab, were visibly personified, and made practically assailable in Moby Dick.

Or do you root our very powerful peers so you can have an unassailable position?I wonder about the premise: I think the widely accepted theory is that 'assailability' and corruption have an inverse relationship; that is, the less assailable you are the more likely you are to be corrupt.

But if these steps, or something approximating them, are necessary, if you can’t just look at your data and come up with a subjective posterior distribution, then how is it reasonable to suppose that you could able to come up with an unassailable subjective distribution before seeing the data?Is the point to end up with an "unassailable subjective distribution"?

I think the real chicken and egg question is, 'do you need an unssailable position to root out your political opposition, or do you need to root out your political opposition to become unassailable'.Democratic leaders are far more assailable -- they have limited power, they can be removed from office, and they are open to public attacks by the media, the public, and competing politicans -- but are considered, partly for that reason, to be less corrupt.