Arms used in a sentence

Arms in a sentence as a noun

I understand it's an arms race with spammers, and they do give a lot of value for free minus ads.

' All that has resulted in is a security arms race which doesn't benefit anyone.

"Also, a call to arms to improve the OSS TextSecure implementation.

Is the only difference that then it was collusion as opposed to an adversarial arms race?

Hold your arms out with pride and hope that someone on the other side of the security barrier sees you and decides to opt out as well.

So don't take this article as justification to feel like there's something mentally wrong with people who join a combat arms unit.

The right to bear arms is also, explicitly, a protection against tyranny BY the government.

The United States sends them billions of dollars worth of arms, surveillance tech and other tools to oppress the Saudi populace.

Responding to inconsistency with more changes seems like trying to regain your balance by making wilder and wilder swings of your arms.

The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.

It's probably a bad idea to bear arms these days, because saying "Officer, I have a weapon in the trunk of my car" might give him reason to shoot you in self defense5.

When prosecutors take up arms in defense of their corrupt prosecutor peers, they become no better than the initially targeted.

I saw many of the same things James did, and I hear Marissa's 'call to arms' about Social and said to myself "If she can't say what it is, how can she expect the troops to achieve it?

Am I expected to believe that a technology company cannot figure out how to run two different business arms with a single customer-facing UI/website?

You didn't make every shot count, you just fired a barrage of rockets and bullets all towards your enemies.>Halo was "grittier" and less silly than previous shooters had beenYeah, demons from **** with miniguns for arms and blood dripping off their fangs are super silly.

HFT people will argue that they provide more liquidity in the market - it's easier to sell your stocks because HF traders increase the overall volume, etc. However, it's in effect launched an arms race between different trading firms and some people say that they're literally making money by skimming off everyone else who trades stocks.

In that case, the debt vanishes and the noteholder becomes an equity holder and everybody wins in terms of optimal positioning of their respective stakes in the venture: founders have gotten their cheap stock that they can hold until a liquidity event, at which time they can sell typically for long-term capital gains and with no intervening taxes to pay; noteholders have gotten their equity stakes with all protections and with no-less-favorable pricing than that offered to the preferred stock investors who presumably have negotiated a good, arms-length deal for themselves; the company avoids a too-early high repricing of its stock so it can continue to offer good incentives to new team members as they join; and the company does not usually have to fool with 409A valuations or with other strings and formalities attending the bringing in of investors via equity rounds.