anti-miscegenation

Do you believe that anti-miscegenation laws should be allowed if the populace decides to vote for them?

A few decades ago it would be as if you were writing checks to an anti-miscegenation organization.

As an example, Loving v Virginia, the Supreme Court case that struck down all anti-miscegenation laws, was in 1967.

Im a younger dev and a bit out of the loop but how would that be anti-miscegenation?

Would you have accepted this as a valid argument back when anti-miscegenation laws were in effect?

Japanese and Chinese Americans have faced lots of historical obstacles, from anti-miscegenation laws to internment camps.

It's far more accurate to compare it to the 60s, when people demonstrated against Jim Crow laws, segregation, and anti-miscegenation laws.

I think it's true that a simple inequality argument likewise doesn't apply in the case of anti-miscegenation laws.

The differences between anti-miscegenation statutes and Prop 8 are superficial at most.

It's tough to say how I'd feel if Brendan Eich had donated to an anti-miscegenation campaign.

You can go pout about it with the anti-miscegenation crowd.

No, what Brendan helped pass was worse than anti-miscegenation laws.

Anti-miscegenation laws had support of the people.