andreesen

Marc Andreesen made a comment on a recent a16z podcast that they were interested in the challenges of global remittances.

Again, such an honest look at the inner workings of Andreesen and his colleagues.

Pikkety doesn't get it, there was a good interview with Andreesen to that effect.

Marc Andreesen could have told this to Jamie Dimon ten years ago.

I think Andreesen and others just have an overwhelming need to put that phrase into every piece of text they create.

Netscape's founders had a multi-billion dollar exit that allowed Marc Andreesen to become a VC and Jim Clark to once own a 90 meter yacht.

That SV diva Marc Andreesen does it all the time, lashing against the old establishment on Twitter right and left, apparently with no bad consequences.

Marc Andreesen has gone dark since starting his venture fund.

Qik had Marc Benioff, Marc Andreesen and Ben Horowitz as early investors, before the latter two started their fund as I recall.

Like Marc Andreesen has said, software is eating the world.

Marc Andreesen for example has a suboptimal head structure for baldness, however I'd venture to say straggles of the remaining hair would look worse.

And is it a good thing to outsource one's resume to a company that somehow, at some point has to justify a $100.000.000 investment by Andreesen & Horowitz?

And when the writer reports Andreesen blowing off Payne as “a self-hating software engineer”, he didn't do that to make Andreesen look good or sound persuasive.

When Andreesen talks about "tech funding", what do they mean by this?

Where things get interesting is Andreesen's "Software Eating the World" essay.

First line, "Marc Andreesen, who created World wide Web...

The whole article is peppered with jabs at Andreesen's personality, skill-set, track record, self-awareness and skull shape.

Andreesen is, quite clearly, at the top of the game in the VC business.

How is this meaningful towards the essay about Andreesen?