academe

There are lots of things trying to influence our actions, and the academe is one of the least of them.

So excellence in the academe does not per se translate immediately to excellence in the business world.

We're talking about orders of magnitude in the disparity between supply and demand in academe vs.

In the sciences and engineering fields, the identity of the academe is hugely invested in producing data, results, or products.

Some dangers are that some very bright people get sucked into academe or other prestige occupations...

Let the old gray academe grinders publish or perish proofs in far too expensive journals.

Lots of physicists hold to the rival Copenhagen interpretation, and have yet to be expelled from the halls of academe for heresy.

The soft skills needed to function in the business world were those that they were born with, or somehow learned outside the academe.

For another thing, the academe and what it teaches is, as a general rule, not really focused on what the business world teaches.

So, it isn't any different, honestly, only instead of money, the currency of academe is pride[0].

That's where we boil away most of the really bad, theory-ahead-of-practice CS ideas that academe cultivates.

And as a grad student myself I must ask, have you considered the possibility of gamification systems in academe(school in general)?

For academe, there is no reward, save the "academic points." This [1] says it well.

> For academe, there is no reward, save the "academic points." I disagree.

The "infamous" "radical" "disastrous" 35-hour workweek was adopted by some of the most conservative industries in the USA as early as the 1950s, such as insurance and academe.

This especially stands out from the article: Academe is a profession full of erudite free-thinkers who feel disillusioned by a toxic labor system in which criticism is not tolerated—so those who leave often relish the newfound ability to say anything they want (talking about “a friend” here).