Deterrence used in a sentence

Deterrence in a sentence as a noun

This is what prosecutors call "deterrence". Sign the petition if you don't want Aaron's death to be in vain.

If you're just executing it's a **** of a deterrence, but you're not reforming at all. Remember the Oslo masscare?

As any prosecutor will tell you, the law is about deterrence as much as it is about punishment.

The people don't have to spend money in taxes imprisoning them, and it provides enough deterrence to just not do it.

Most people who talk about it simply don't have enough knowledge of statistics, or the psychology of deterrence.

The value of class-action suits is deterrence. Otherwise, it can be very profitable to steal a little bit of money or cause a little bit of harm to a large number of people.

With this kind of logic we will never get rid of the nuclear deterrence theory, and we'll keep that shadow over our heads until someone actually pulls the trigger one day. But it's ok, because "they are paid to do so" ?

I find it outrageous that the manager of that facility claimed that "their acts had an impact on nuclear deterrence" - their acts did not, his did and IMO he should rot in jail. Dont blame the mirror for your ugly face.

Surely you clever people can think of forms of punishment/deterrence less destructive to both the individual and society as a whole.

- Is the goal to deterrence? That's fine, but prison sentences only really work as deterrence for premeditated crimes, and thieves are typically addicts of some sort.

Penalties for financial misconduct need to be far harsher than they are now to achieve even a basic level of deterrence. This may be very difficult to achieve purely with fines.

I can actually remember what it was like during the Cold War and I can assure you that one thing that deterrence does not do is provide peace of mind for anyone.

Another factor is the quality of deterrence: the point is not to arbitrarily and randomly ruin peoples' lives. You want a high ratio of crime reduction to damage.

"TBH I don't get why public urination deserves more than a ticket as deterrence. Listing someone as a convicted sex offender is quite frankly absurd for such a benign infraction."

The nature of global threats continue to evolve but the importance of deterrence remains the same. For better or for worse, this country has amazing resources and if we didn't protect it, another bully on the block is going to make a grab for it.

Punishment is unfortunately needed for deterrence. But 20 years?

There is value in deterrence, your honor; this court must send a message [... ] National security crimes that undermine the entire system must be taken seriously.

That can leave nothing to compensate for the removal of the deterrence factor that the threat of lawsuits provides against bad corporate or professional behavior. A sad example is provided by Texas.

This is a distinct concept from "deterrence." The idea of deterrence is to force people to include the probability-weighted cost of a jail sentence into their cost-benefit analysis. A jail sentence twice as long means a twice as strong deterrent effect. However, given the practical probabilities of getting caught for many crimes, deterrence doesn't really exist.

, apparently considering this an appropriate, perhaps even good, way to punish criminals, since it adds to the deterrence factor by making the prospect of going to a prison with such conditions a frightening one. I guess we can make some hierarchy, where maintaining a prison system filled with starving inmates is worse than a rape-filled prison, which is in turn worse than a merely filthy/diseased prison, but it seems sort of pointless to justify things that way.