within-group

I mean partly, but it's because you’re mixing up aggregate vs within-group numbers.

My instinct says there's likely more within-group variation than between-group variation especially in the US.

This finding is robust for both between-group comparison of high- versus low-reputational-risk accounts and within-group comparison across engagement types (i.e., likes vs.

Crucially, behavioural geneticists across the field stress that within-group heritability cannot be used to infer genetic explanations for differences between socially defined groups.

Experts overwhelmingly agreed that IQ has substantial within-group heritability, and among those willing to give a number, the average estimate was ~60% for U.

Did the test collect any data on the demographics of the takers, so that we can check whether the drop is within-group, or whether it’s just artifact of changing composition?

Perhaps your peer group encourages conformity to within-group phone norms?

The amounts for between-group variation are probably similar to the amounts for within-group variation, but there are reasons why they might not be exactly the same.

> Perhaps your peer group encourages conformity to within-group phone norms?

> Comparing the level of within-group physical aggression among chimpanzees with human hunter-gatherer communities, chimps are 150 to 550 times more likely than humans to inflict violence against their peers.

Grounded in the idea that ethnocentrism also facilitates within-group trust, cooperation, and coordination, we conjecture that ethnocentrism may be modulated by brain oxytocin, a peptide shown to promote cooperation among in-group members.

Maxims like "within-group variance is larger than between-group variance" don't help in physical combat, you know.

You quantify the "within-group" variation not with standard deviations, but by measuring all individuals in a group and finding the endpoints.

"Within-group" variation can be quantified as standard deviation (among other metrics).