wildfire

If the underlying reason for the intervention is to prevent irrational behaviour then where was the regulator when the price was going up like wildfire?

First, sorry but no excuses for releasing questionable studies that will spread like wildfire due to confirmation bias.

That propagated like wildfire and finally became unusable (proving that those two references could not/would not have the same lifetime).

If Google would have done that G+ would have taken off like wildfire and nobody would have ever looked back.

Blatant racism against gypsies an arabs spread like wildfire on Facebook in sweden this way.

What Ive seen in the tight knit IoT communities is the ESP8266 going like wildfire.

Unlimited starbucks coffee can also be had by visiting any large wildfire and scooping the ashes into a container full of water.

Nothing was as huge as Napster was, and it was spreading like wildfire too.

The conditions for risk from wildfire do arise out of a multitude of factors.

They could have done it 5MPH and car manufacturers would still take notice because it would still spread like wildfire on the Internet.

But it might be worth the trade-off for dealing with the wildfire quicker.

I’m too young to remember what the northwest was like before things like wildfire control threw everything out of balance.

It caught like wildfire and people said they were "getting their noff on"..

Clearly people care about the topic, and it's not like I contributed "less" to the discussion than the original comment I replied to, which was up-voted like wildfire.

That was basically Google Buzz (which of course was basically FriendFeed) - and far from "taking off like wildfire" it struggled tremendously, despite the huge benefit of being directly integrated into GMail.