weights

One litre of water at 4 degrees weights 3% more than 1 litre at 90 degrees, i.e.

It's like two kids growing up, one kid is forced to carry 30 lb weights as he walks to school.

Watching the latest Mythbuster episode is enlightening, particularly if you take the weights of the crafts they're testing into account.

It's a very inefficient way of converting food to human energy to humans lifting weights that in turn power the lights.

There's a nice bash script [4] that downloads the font you want in all its formats/weights and generates the proper CSS.

He weights every minute detail in a intuitive way and computes most likely outcomes.

The result of the kid who carries weights is that he will get stronger.

But it's hardly a tradeoff, he's in a situation where he's forced to carry those weights whether he wants to or not, he's not getting anything in return, except the consequences of carrying those weights.

Maybe sleeping has some role in recalculating the weights for the neural net?

Problem is, getting the same energy input via batteries weights 50~100 times as much as fuel does, and takes 15~40 times as much room.

All that said, good coaching, especially with big weights, is very important.

These all need to be combined with weights based on other priors.

The connections are called "weights", and the training adjusts the weights of all the neuron with lots of cases until the desired output is achieved.

There are multiple dimensions to what people "like/dislike" and people assign different (and hidden) weights to them.

The effectiveness comes from their non-linear nature and their ability to "learn" (store knowledge in the weights, that is derived from the training process).

This "lifting weights" thing is a silly gimmick.